Capybara
The capybara demonstrates terrestrial velocities of 22 mph during sprint conditions, a capability that has proven essential for predator evasion in its native South American habitat. This speed positions it among the faster members of the rodent order.
Aquatic locomotion occurs at a more measured pace of 5 mph, though the species compensates through exceptional underwater duration capabilities, remaining submerged for up to five minutes when circumstances require. The capybara's mobility profile represents a versatile combination of land and water transit options unavailable to most competing entities.
Long-distance travel has been documented at sustained rates of 8-10 mph, enabling capybaras to traverse significant territories in search of suitable grazing areas and water sources.
Pizza
Pizza demonstrates a velocity of precisely zero miles per hour under standard conditions. As an inanimate food preparation, autonomous locomotion falls outside its operational parameters entirely.
Movement occurs exclusively through external intervention—human transport, delivery vehicles, or conveyor systems. Delivery services report average transit speeds of 15-25 mph in urban environments, though this figure reflects vehicle capabilities rather than inherent pizza mobility.
The pizza's complete absence of self-propulsion represents a fundamental limitation in competitive mobility assessments. No amount of technological advancement has successfully addressed this intrinsic characteristic of prepared flatbread.
VERDICT
The velocity differential in this category proves absolute and insurmountable. The capybara possesses genuine autonomous movement capabilities, while pizza requires complete external assistance for any spatial transition whatsoever.
This comparison illustrates the fundamental distinction between animate and inanimate entities. A capybara can initiate movement through its own biological systems; a pizza cannot. The margin of victory—22 mph versus 0 mph—represents not merely a quantitative gap but a categorical difference in locomotive capacity. The capybara claims this criterion by the widest possible margin.